|
|||||||||
|
Guide
to the Loire regions
Savennières La
Grande Bourgeoisie, les Paysans et les Étrangers D’Artagnan: ‘Pray ask our host if he does not have a few good bottles of Coulée de Serrant hidden behind the logs in his cellar’. – ‘Le Vicomte de Bragelonne’ by Alexandre Dumas (1844)
The
Ten Best Historical Bottles
Innovation
versus tradition
With
the arrival of these outsiders have come varying philosophies on how the
wines should be made, how they should taste and from what age they can be
consumed. These stylistic preferences revolve primarily around cellar
practices, given there is only a single variety, Chenin, with which the
growers can work. The use of small and sometimes new oak is, for example,
a phenomenon that would have been alien here until the mid 1990s. Savennières
has always been considered a cerebral wine - never facile - demanding
contemplation, a wine characterised by its unforgiving youthful austerity
and razor sharp acidity, but then true Chenin is defined by the tension
and nervosity derived from the levels of malic acid found within. So
the wines here are evolving, even among the established producers, who are
adapting their own winemaking techniques as they seek to tame Chenin’s
naturally high acidity and pithy-bitterness which is so inherent on these
hard, schistous soils. Factors such as the influence of botrytis at
harvest, the introduction of malolactic fermentation and the raising of
wines in wood ensure that there is no longer one definitive expression of
Savennières. Thankfully, and unlike so many other regions in
One
of the most influential and vocal characters within the appellation in the
1800s was Pierre Constant Guillory (1796 – 1878). A Swiss native,
Guillory owned a house and vines within La Roche aux Moines and became
founder and president of La Société
Agricole et Industrielle de l’Anjou. In one of his numerous
bulletins to the Society he details the planting of experimental
varieties, including Pinot Noir, Pinot Gris, Muscat, Groslot, Merlot, Carmenet (an old bordelaise synonym for Cabernet
Franc), Gamay, Liverdun and Mâlain within his vineyard. In his papers he
recommends the planting of Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Franc in
preference to Chenin on the basis that they ripened 15 to 20 days earlier.
He initiated the creation of a viticultural school and between 1857 and
1861 distributed 60,000 Cabernet vines through the region. In 1847
Guillory was the first in the appellation to experiment with sulphur to
combat oïdium (powdery mildew). Downy
mildew arrived here in 1880, the same year as phylloxera. Various sulphur-based treatments were used in an attempt to arrest the spread of
phylloxera until in 1889 the viticultural station in Saumur elected
Savennières to be the first in the region to test Chenin’s suitability
to grafting onto Vitis labrusca. A year later, Pierre Viala of the Institut
National d’Agronomie returned from a tour of the Post
phylloxera, vineyards were not replanted to the same extent and although
some parcels were planted to hybrids, particularly Noah or Othello, it
helped to consolidate Chenin’s position as the dominant white variety
within the region. By 1925 a total of 408 ha had been re-established; 190
ha in Savennières itself, 64 ha in Epiré, 138 ha in La Possonnière and
16 ha on the Although
Savennières had been recognised for the quality of its wines well before
the conception of the Appellation Contrôlée system in 1936, it was not
until 1952 that the region was granted its own AC. After the Second World
War ended, there were more important, and not necessarily viticultural,
issues affecting the region for this to be perceived as a priority. It was
not until seven years after the conflict ended that there was sufficient
motivation to start setting down the principles for the appellation. It
was two men, Bernard Closel, owner of Château des Vaults and Mayor of
Savennières, and Jacques Roussier (whose descendents still own the Château
du Coulaine) who were the driving force behind the legislation.
Appellation Savennières Contrôlée came into being on the 8th
December 1952.
In
addition to the law for Savennières itself, the authorities recognised
the provenance of the two most historical sites, bestowing them with their
own sub-appellations; Savennières – Le Clos de la Coulée de Serrant
and Savennières – La Roche aux Moines. Arguably, these could be
considered as the ‘Grand Crus’ of the appellation although no such
formal classification exists. Informal debate continues between the
growers as to whether this would be a good thing; a recognisable system of
quality, but views tend to be polarised; in addition the introduction of
such a system goes somewhat against the egalitarian principles of the
Angevine temperament. Confusingly though, some growers, such as Soulez and
Bizard in Epiré, have traditionally used the term ‘Grand Cru d’Anjou’
on their labels, although this has no legal definition. It
is important to note that historically, and at the time the legislation
for the appellation was being established, Savennières was recognised as
a region for sweet, or at the very least demi-sec
or sec-tendre wines, with the
limits imposed for potential alcohol and yield set to reflect this: 25
hectolitres per hectare (hl/ha) with a minimum alcohol (allowing for
chaptalization) of 12.5%. These limits echo those of similar appellations
such as Bonnezeaux and Quarts de Chaume across the river. Despite
Savennières being one of the smallest but most recognised names in French
wine culture, the appellation suffered from something of an identity
crisis in the 1960s as the fashion for drinking sweet or off-dry wines
diminished. By the end of the decade most of the ten full-time producers
had changed their vinification methods to accommodate the demand for drier
styles, albeit at production levels that were only really financially
viable for moëlleux and demi-sec. It is generally acknowledged that it was the Château de
la Roche aux Moines who was first to adapt its winemaking techniques to
encompass the increasing fashion for dry wines, with each of the 1961,
1966 and 1969 vintages all appearing to be vinified as sec. Given
that most sales of Savennières well into the 1970s were en vrac, meant that growers would vinify specific barrels to suit
the needs of particular customers, selling off wine to either loyal
private clients to bottle at home, or to the Brasseries of Paris, Angers
and Tours whose owners or representatives would visit once a year
exchanging one or two empty barrels for those containing the new vintage.
Nicolas, the eponymous French wine merchant, was certainly very active in
buying by the cask here during the 1930s and 1940s. This practice of
selling in bulk helps to explain why it is so difficult to find antique
bottles in the bourgeois cellars of Savennières as most of the wine would
have been disposed of within six months of the vintage. At
Château d’Epiré some wine at least was committed to bottle each
vintage, with museum stocks at the chateau dating back to 1900, whilst a
label library has examples from to the 19th Century. The oldest
label in existence simply reads ‘Château d’Epiré 1875 (
Both
Jean Baumard and François Roussier had lobbied the INAO to review the
appellation laws, but to no effect. The older generation of vignerons
were beginning to retire and without any succession, vineyards were being
abandoned. Many of the bourgeois families had other professions or
interests, maintaining their houses simply as country retreats, whilst
others such as Château d’Epiré, ran a herd of dairy cattle until 1980
as an additional source of income. By the early 1980s, of the 15 or so
active growers only three drew their income from winemaking alone. Savennières
as an appellation appeared to be going out of business.
Until
the arrival of growers from outside the region, most notably of Jean
Baumard in 1968, Savennières was vinified solely within the appellation,
and except for a token amount of Anjou Rouge and Rosé, or the possibility
of a very occasional Coteaux de la Loire, this will have been the only
wine produced as no vigneron
exploited vines outside the immediate region. The producers themselves
fell into two distinct groups: paysan
vignerons who tended their own vines, mostly as tenants, and the noble
and bourgeois families that inhabited the region. All of the paysan
farmers were local, being born and raised within the region. Some, in
addition to tending their own vines, were also in the employ of the local
aristocracy. Eustache Poilasne, for example, owned and lived within the 2
ha Clos des Perrières but also acted as a consultant to Domaine aux
Moines, whilst Lucien Rousseau and Albert Gigot who were employed as mâitres
de chais at Clos du Coulaine and Château de la Bizolière
respectively, were both natives of Savennières. Gigot retired in about
1970 and the decision was taken by Baron Brincard, Château de la Bizolière’s
owner, to start slowly withdrawing from production altogether, preferring
instead to rent out the vines, with 1982 being the final vintage to be
vinified at their cellar in the village. This
is perhaps the most celebrated example of the decline in the appellation
towards the end of the 1970s and into the early 1980s, but other
casualties do exist. In the 1963 edition of Vignes
et Vins de France there are twelve different growers cited under Le
Clos du Papillon alone. Along with Château de la Bizolière itself, other
producers listed include La Grande Roche, Château de la Comtrie, Rochepin,
Bécherelle, Les Cendres, Goutte d’Or and Varennes. We know that the
Pirie family of Varennes sold vines to Jean Baumard and that Nicolas Joly
now rents vines from Rochepin, whilst Goutte d’Or is still within the
Cointreau family, although remains unplanted, Sadly, information on the
others has been lost in time. Similarly in La Possonnière, there are
eleven growers named; Chateau de la Possonnière was still producing at
least until 1982 and the vineyards of La Hutte can still be seen, although
they have been completely abandoned. Of the vineyards cited above, only
one is still in existence today, Le Clos de Fremine, although even this is
under different ownership.
It
was not until the mid 1980s that the fortunes of Savennières began to
improve. In 1983 Henri Rochais and his son, Guy, owners of Chateau de
Plaisance in Chaume, bought a 2 hectare parcel from the Soulez family in
Le Clos de Maurières, which was subsequently grubbed up and replanted.
Rochais was followed by Pascal Laffourcade who rents the 3.2 ha Clos de la
Royauté from Baron Brincard. Both released their inaugural vintages in
1988 to become the first vignerons
since Jean Baumard twenty years earlier to enter the appellation. From
here the trend continued and today of the 34 producers who are active in
the appellation, all but ten have their origins in the Layon.
The
reason why so many Layon producers have shown interest in Savennières in
the past decade is pretty simple to comprehend. For the most part, these
growers’ prime objective is to produce sweeter expressions of Chenin,
and although dry wines are produced along the length of the Layon, they
carry the generic appellation of Anjou Blanc. In addition to Chenin, most
growers will also have Cabernet Franc and Cabernet Sauvignon planted,
often augmented with some Gamay and Grolleau. However, after the
extraordinary vintages of 1989 and 1990, the market for sweet wines began
to diminish, whilst the demand for red Anjou
wines from anywhere beyond the region has always been nominal. Growers
from the Layon needed to look at possible alternatives, and Savennières
offered a practical solution. The situation that existed during the early
1990s was that whilst the appellation remained exceptionally small, it
maintained a high quality image, commanding premium prices for wines that
were perceived to be rare; Savennières was primarily made by the
bourgeois classes for the drinking pleasure of the bourgeois classes. The
Layon growers recognised that there was potential to make money producing
Savennières; land was available for sale or rent and was easily
accessible from the Layon both to work the vines and to harvest and
transport the crop back to their cellars. Today, there are a total of 26
growers who vinify their Savennières outside of the appellation. Whilst
this injection of interest and investment was broadly welcomed by the
existing producers, it is also fair to say that the Layon growers were
viewed with some suspicion. Even Florent Baumard, whose family have been
producing Savennières for the past 40 years, still considers himself as
an outsider. Within
The
Decree of 1996 The
appellation laws finally received a complete overhaul in the mid 1990s to
encompass the changes in attitude within the region. It formally
recognised the existence of the different wine styles, allowing vignerons
to make the decision of whether to produce dry, off-dry or sweeter
expressions of Savennières, with Michèle Bazin de Jessy, owner of Château
des Vaults - and the first ever lady president of a growers’ syndicate
in France - signing off the décret on
the 5th December 1996. The new laws allowed for higher yields;
50hl/ha for dry wines - classified as under 8g/l residual sugar (the
highest permitted level in France for sec
– when 2g/l would be considered the norm), and 40hl/ha for demi-sec
(for wines with between 8 and 18g/l)
moëlleux (18 and 45g/l) and doux
(in excess of 45g/l residual sugar). Today,
dry wines account for around 90% of the appellation’s production,
although average yields (at 34hl/ha) are considerably less that the
maximum allowed; indeed the lowest of any French dry white wine. In
addition to the increase in yields, the minimum permitted alcohol level
was reduced from 12% to 10%, the changes here possibly driven by a legacy
of poor vintages for the first part of the decade, although in this period
of global warming, keeping alcohols below 15% alcohol has become more of a
challenge than attaining minimum levels. Finally the changes in the law
allowed for the introduction of mechanical harvesting, but only after the
first picking had been harvested by hand. Although some experiments were
conducted by Château Chamboureau, no grower has embraced harvesting by
machine, and this aspect of the decree is likely to be written out of the
proposed 2008 update. Other likely changes this year will be the increase
in minimum alcohol to 11% and the banning of any chaptalization. The
minimum residual sugar level for dry wines is also likely to drop to 6g/l.
With regards to yields, no changes are predicted, although given that the
averages are well below the permitted 50hl/ha for sec,
this seems academic. Although not on the agenda, the ending of en vrac sales (in the same way that no Alsatian wine is allowed to
be sold in any medium other than glass) would surely help to protect the
reputation and status and image of the appellation, as would the outlawing
of the unauthorised use of the term ‘Grand Cru’ on certain producers
labels. |